#1
|
|||
|
|||
[Dixonary] Embellishing Text from Excel
The discussion in the GRA defs thread about ordered lists exported from
Excel and the difficulty of bringing across italics and emboldening made me wonder whether using Markdown would work in Google Groups. This is really a test to see if it does. _Italics_ are marked using underscores. **Bold text** is marked with pairs of asterisks. Here is Paul's def from the last round: in _singular_ and _plural_. Frequently with _the_. A fit of depression, _esp_. one caused by a hangover (chiefly _S. Afr_.). Often in _**the dreaded woofits**_. Also, formerly: a type of dance. I just want to see how it appears, both on the Group website and in email. -- Tim L On Sunday, September 13, 2020 at 7:17:21 PM UTC+1, Efrem G Mallach wrote:You're right, Paul. Italics have to be put back by hand. I generally have few enough of those, often zero, that it doesn't create a problem in practice. I have not had, or seen, any of the other problems you describe. Having a hard-coded number in the def shouldn't affect wrapping. It's true that HTML lists indent nicely, but I haven't seen lack of indent after the first line become a problem either. Anyhow, whatever works for a given dealer, yourself included, is fine with me! I'd rather cope with an HTML list than deal! And I appreciate your calling attention to the list formatting. Some other people have also used lists, but left it to each player to discover that. Efrem On Sep 13, 2020, at 1:10 PM, Paul Keating <kea... (AT) acm (DOT) org> wrote: Efrem, The problem with constructing the list with a spreadsheet is that things like italicized labels don't survive the concatenation process. For example, in Excel, this set of cells (with formula showing): <int_1.png> yields this result: <int_2.png> The problem is that the italics are achieved by hidden markup attached to the cell, not to the data, and disappear when you use the cell value in a formula. That is Excel, but Google Sheets works the same way (as I discovered today). Despite considerable progress since the last time I tried it (before round 746), I think spreadsheets are still a poor fit for the admin of dealing a round. I'm in any case far from convinced that defeating the numbered-list functionality is a good thing. List format ensures clean, legible indentation on small screens, by folding back long lines under a hanging indent. Forcing a hard coded number does not. I lost track of the number of deadlines I missed after postponing voting until I could get to a desktop, because the announcement had been explicitly formatted for a 72-character display with spaces and line-breaks, and appeared on a small screen as an unreadable wodge of text with random waterfalls of whitespace. But I never complained about that, even though I thought my inconvenience was at least as much as having to press 3 extra keys after a cut and paste operation. P -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...oglegroups.com. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|