Tapcis Web Forums

Tapcis Web Forums (http://www.tapcis.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Parlor (http://www.tapcis.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS (http://www.tapcis.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15318)

Judy Madnick November 19th, 2019 08:46 AM

[Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly.

I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!

Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores.

Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.

Daniel B Widdis November 19th, 2019 09:19 AM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
“I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!”



Frequently when there are two non-combined definitions that I think should have been combined, I tend to believe the shorter one because I assume most dealers won’t combine and use the longer def.** So unexpected, but you’ve thrown a wrench in that strategy!



From: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Judy Madnick <jmadnick (AT) gmail (DOT) .com>
Reply-To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:46 AM
To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Subject: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS



Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly.



I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!



Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores.



Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net.

Johnb - co.uk November 19th, 2019 09:21 AM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
Judy

congrats on the D0 (even though it means that I got no points)

*JohnnyB*

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...hn-barrs.co.uk.

Judy Madnick November 19th, 2019 09:24 AM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
LOL!





Original message
From: "Daniel B Widdis" <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net>
To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com;
Dated: 11/19/2019 10:19:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS


“I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!”

Frequently when there are two non-combined definitions that I think should have been combined, I tend to believe the shorter one because I assume most dealers won’t combine and use the longer def. So unexpected, but you’ve thrown a wrench in that strategy!

From: on behalf of Judy Madnick
Reply-To:
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:46 AM
To:
Subject: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS

Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly.

I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!

Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores.

Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.

Judy Madnick November 19th, 2019 09:27 AM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
Thanks, John. I couldn't believe that the very first "fake" definition I received was yours...with such a similar definition!

Judy



Original message
From: "Johnb - co.uk" <johnb (AT) john-barrs (DOT) co.uk>
To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com;
Dated: 11/19/2019 10:21:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS


Judy
congrats on the D0 (even though it means that I got no points)
JohnnyB



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...hn-barrs.co.uk.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.

Hugo Kornelis November 19th, 2019 05:13 PM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
Whew! Dodged a bullet!

In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend
to retain the generic one over the specific one.
YMMV.

Cheers,
Hugo


Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick:
> Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end
> this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected
> everyone to vote so quickly.
> I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real"
> definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in
> addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html*shown below). The first
> "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a
> pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I*didn't know
> whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more
> complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the
> "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't
> know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!
> *Tim Lodge,*with*5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5
> points but is lower in the rolling scores. *
> Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached
> .pdf file.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Dixonary" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/19ED88020B13092E0AB000700E%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info.

Judy Madnick November 19th, 2019 08:35 PM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
The fact that I was combining the real definition with his fake definition made it a more difficult decision, IMO. Whatever the case, so far no one has complained. LOL!

Judy



Original message
From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info>
To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com;
Dated: 11/19/2019 6:13:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS

Whew! Dodged a bullet!

In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to retain the generic one over the specific one.
YMMV.

Cheers,
Hugo



Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick:

Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly.

I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!

Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores.

Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.

Daniel B Widdis November 19th, 2019 08:56 PM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
Rule #1:* The dealer is God.

Rule #2:* Don’t complain about what God does. 😉



From: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Judy Madnick <jmadnick (AT) gmail (DOT) .com>
Reply-To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:35 PM
To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS



The fact that I was combining the real definition with his fake definition made it a more difficult decision, IMO. Whatever the case, so far no one has complained. LOL!



Judy



Original message
From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info>
To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com;
Dated: 11/19/2019 6:13:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS

Whew! Dodged a bullet!

In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to retain the generic one over the specific one.
YMMV.

Cheers,
Hugo

Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick:

Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly.



I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!



Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores.



Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net.

Judy M. November 19th, 2019 09:17 PM

Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
 
LOL! I'll try to remember that.

Judy

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 9:56 PM Daniel B Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> wrote:

> Rule #1: The dealer is God.
>
> Rule #2: Don’t complain about what God does. 😉
>
>
>
> *From: *<dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Judy Madnick <
> jmadnick (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
> *Reply-To: *<dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:35 PM
> *To: *<dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
>
>
>
> The fact that I was combining the real definition with his fake definition
> made it a more difficult decision, IMO. Whatever the case, so far no one
> has complained. LOL!
>
>
>
> Judy
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Original message
> From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info>
> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com;
> Dated: 11/19/2019 6:13:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
>
> Whew! Dodged a bullet!
>
> In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to
> retain the generic one over the specific one.
> YMMV.
>
> Cheers,
> Hugo
>
> Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick:
>
> Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this
> round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote
> so quickly.
>
>
>
> I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real"
> definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in
> addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first
> "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar"
> from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I
> should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex
> definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it
> wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the
> right decision...but it is what it is!
>
>
>
> *Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points
> but is lower in the rolling scores. *
>
>
>
> Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf
> file.
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Dixonary" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/19ED88020B13092E0AB000700E%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Dixonary" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/9972bb73-a758-9f80-fad5-f4b1b97f0015%40perFact.info?utm_medium=email&utm_s ource=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Dixonary" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/1C76F34A0B1315231E1F001002%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Dixonary" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/FD73A36C-B343-46CE-B706-8874145DB450%40dixonary.net?utm_medium=email&utm_s ource=footer>
> .
>


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...ail.gmail..com.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.