[Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly.
I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is! Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores. Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
“I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!”
Frequently when there are two non-combined definitions that I think should have been combined, I tend to believe the shorter one because I assume most dealers won’t combine and use the longer def.** So unexpected, but you’ve thrown a wrench in that strategy! From: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Judy Madnick <jmadnick (AT) gmail (DOT) .com> Reply-To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:46 AM To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> Subject: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly. I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is! Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores. Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
Judy
congrats on the D0 (even though it means that I got no points) *JohnnyB* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...hn-barrs.co.uk. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
LOL!
Original message From: "Daniel B Widdis" <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; Dated: 11/19/2019 10:19:42 AM Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS “I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is!” Frequently when there are two non-combined definitions that I think should have been combined, I tend to believe the shorter one because I assume most dealers won’t combine and use the longer def. So unexpected, but you’ve thrown a wrench in that strategy! From: on behalf of Judy Madnick Reply-To: Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:46 AM To: Subject: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly. I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is! Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores. Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
Thanks, John. I couldn't believe that the very first "fake" definition I received was yours...with such a similar definition!
Judy Original message From: "Johnb - co.uk" <johnb (AT) john-barrs (DOT) co.uk> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; Dated: 11/19/2019 10:21:35 AM Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS Judy congrats on the D0 (even though it means that I got no points) JohnnyB -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...hn-barrs.co.uk. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
Whew! Dodged a bullet!
In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to retain the generic one over the specific one. YMMV. Cheers, Hugo Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick: > Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end > this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected > everyone to vote so quickly. > I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" > definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in > addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html*shown below). The first > "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a > pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I*didn't know > whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more > complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the > "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't > know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is! > *Tim Lodge,*with*5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 > points but is lower in the rolling scores. * > Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached > .pdf file. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com > <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/19ED88020B13092E0AB000700E%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
The fact that I was combining the real definition with his fake definition made it a more difficult decision, IMO. Whatever the case, so far no one has complained. LOL!
Judy Original message From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; Dated: 11/19/2019 6:13:33 PM Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS Whew! Dodged a bullet! In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to retain the generic one over the specific one. YMMV. Cheers, Hugo Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick: Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly. I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is! Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores. Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
Rule #1:* The dealer is God.
Rule #2:* Don’t complain about what God does. 😉 From: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Judy Madnick <jmadnick (AT) gmail (DOT) .com> Reply-To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:35 PM To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS The fact that I was combining the real definition with his fake definition made it a more difficult decision, IMO. Whatever the case, so far no one has complained. LOL! Judy Original message From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; Dated: 11/19/2019 6:13:33 PM Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS Whew! Dodged a bullet! In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to retain the generic one over the specific one. YMMV. Cheers, Hugo Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick: Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote so quickly. I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the right decision...but it is what it is! Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points but is lower in the rolling scores. Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf file. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net. |
Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS
LOL! I'll try to remember that.
Judy On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 9:56 PM Daniel B Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> wrote: > Rule #1: The dealer is God. > > Rule #2: Don’t complain about what God does. 😉 > > > > *From: *<dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Judy Madnick < > jmadnick (AT) gmail (DOT) com> > *Reply-To: *<dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> > *Date: *Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 6:35 PM > *To: *<dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> > *Subject: *Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS > > > > The fact that I was combining the real definition with his fake definition > made it a more difficult decision, IMO. Whatever the case, so far no one > has complained. LOL! > > > > Judy > > > ------------------------------ > > Original message > From: "Hugo Kornelis" <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info> > To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; > Dated: 11/19/2019 6:13:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 3028 - OBELISCOLYCHNY - RESULTS > > Whew! Dodged a bullet! > > In the few cases where I was faced with combination candidates, I tend to > retain the generic one over the specific one. > YMMV. > > Cheers, > Hugo > > Op 19-11-2019 om 15:46 schreef Judy Madnick: > > Since everyone who submitted a definition has voted, I'm going to end this > round since my busy day hasn't yet begun! I never expected everyone to vote > so quickly. > > > > I'm sure glad this round is over! So here's what happened: The "real" > definition was "lightouse." (I found this definition on websites in > addition to http://phrontistery.info/o.html shown below). The first > "fake" definition I received was "[Arch] a lighthouse built on a pillar" > from John Barrs. In combining the definitions, I didn't know whether I > should use the simple "lighthouse" option or John's more complex > definition. Had the combined definitions not included the "real" word, it > wouldn't have been an issue (in my mind!). I don't know whether I made the > right decision...but it is what it is! > > > > *Tim Lodge, with 5 points, is the next dealer. Hugo also received 5 points > but is lower in the rolling scores. * > > > > Here are the results in table form as a .jpg -- or see the attached .pdf > file. > > [image: Image removed by sender.] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/19ED88020B13092E0AB000700E%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/9972bb73-a758-9f80-fad5-f4b1b97f0015%40perFact.info?utm_medium=email&utm_s ource=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-NG0A64CK > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/1C76F34A0B1315231E1F001002%40LAPTOP-NG0A64CK?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/FD73A36C-B343-46CE-B706-8874145DB450%40dixonary.net?utm_medium=email&utm_s ource=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...ail.gmail..com. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.