[Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd
gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. *Option 1: "To the group". * This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? *Option 1: "To the group". * *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs."* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I vote for #1.
On 8/5/2019 6:38 PM, Daniel B. Widdis wrote: Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later.Ā* Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. Ā* But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option.Ā* Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote?Ā* Where do we want replies sent?Ā* Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group".Ā* This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro:Ā* We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group".Ā* Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0b7e6a36-0302-c3e4-d8e2-e6675de13eef%40salsgiver.com. |
RE: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
To the group...please!
Judy Original message From: "Daniel B. Widdis" <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; Dated: 8/5/2019 6:38:04 PM Subject: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group". This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group". Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-BV6VBI87. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
Iāll also opt for #1.
Chris Sent from my iPad On Aug 5, 2019, at 19:11, France International/Mike Shefler <stamps (AT) salsgiver (DOT) com<mailto:stamps (AT) salsgiver (DOT) com>> wrote: I vote for #1. On 8/5/2019 6:38 PM, Daniel B. Widdis wrote: Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group". This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group". Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com<mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source =footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com<mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0b7e6a36-0302-c3e4-d8e2-e6675de13eef%40salsgiver.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0b7e6a36-0302-c3e4-d8e2-e6675de13eef%40salsgiver.com?utm_medium=email&utm_ source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...od.outlook.com. |
[Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
As a Coryphaeus user Iām voting for #1 too.
Thatās 5 to āgo backā and nobody liking the way it currently is.Ā* Is it too early to close the polls?Ā* š I will try to switch it back before Judy posts her call for votes. From: "Daniel B. Widdis" <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> Date: Monday, August 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM To: Dixonary <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> Subject: [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group". This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group". Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net. |
Fwd: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I'll also vote #1. My understanding is that the problem arose when Efrem's
email address seemed to change. If that's the case, maybe we could change back and Efrem could put a note in his msg when he deals reminding players of this. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Daniel B Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019, 1:27 PM Subject: [Dixonary] Re: [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote To: Dixonary <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> As a Coryphaeus user Iām voting for #1 too. Thatās 5 to āgo backā and nobody liking the way it currently is. Is it too early to close the polls? š I will try to switch it back before Judy posts her call for votes. *From: *"Daniel B. Widdis" <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> *Date: *Monday, August 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM *To: *Dixonary <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> *Subject: *[OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. *Option 1: "To the group". * This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? *Option 1: "To the group". * *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs."* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/33A7B17A-F094-4E9F-A95E-0C3AF7EA2812%40dixonary.net?utm_medium=email&utm_s ource=footer> .. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
Iāll also opt for 1.
Chris Sent from my iPhone On Aug 5, 2019, at 19:11, France International/Mike Shefler <stamps (AT) salsgiver (DOT) com<mailto:stamps (AT) salsgiver (DOT) com>> wrote: I vote for #1. On 8/5/2019 6:38 PM, Daniel B. Widdis wrote: Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group". This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group". Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com<mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source =footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com<mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0b7e6a36-0302-c3e4-d8e2-e6675de13eef%40salsgiver.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0b7e6a36-0302-c3e4-d8e2-e6675de13eef%40salsgiver.com?utm_medium=email&utm_ source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...od.outlook.com. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
To me, it's just a game (and I'm not very active anway)
I /usually/ remembe to check the To bar before sending a def, or a vote. No preference from me. (Well, I do have a slight personal preference but not big enough to make it into a vote) Op 6-8-2019 om 00:38 schreef Daniel B. Widdis: > Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that > I'd gather feedback later.Ā* Of course, then I got distracted and > feedback was sparse. Ā* But it seemed most were at least content with > the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured > it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental > private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public > definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. > > Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with > Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having > things public by default is a preferred option.Ā* Plus, Judy probably > has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid > of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) > > So can we put this to a vote?Ā* Where do we want replies sent?Ā* Please > reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or > indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. > > *Option 1: "To the group". > * > > This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both > "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. > > Pro: > We've been playing that way for years and are used to it > Votes are public by default > Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors > Email format that Coryphaeus expects > Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists > Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by > default and users had to take specific action to send private email > > Con: > Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ > The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of > emails on configuring replies > Different reply-to behavior than normal email > > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > * > * > This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and > "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case > the group. > > Pro: > Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public > discussion" lists. > Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could > (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) > Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by > default) > Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs > > Con: > Not what we're used to > Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion > Not compatible with Coryphaeus > > Your votes? > *Option 1: "To the group". * > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for > fake defs."* > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com > <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source =footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
Oh, good, at least one vote for #3! š
Based on the overwhelming preference to let Google decide how to send our email, Iāll be switching it back to āTo the Groupā prior to the def submission deadline tomorrow. From: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> on behalf of Hugo Kornelis <hugo (AT) perFact (DOT) info> Date: Monday, August 5, 2019 at 9:43 PM To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote To me, it's just a game (and I'm not very active anway) I usually remembe to check the To bar before sending a def, or a vote. No preference from me. (Well, I do have a slight personal preference but not big enough to make it into a vote) Op 6-8-2019 om 00:38 schreef Daniel B. Widdis: Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group". This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group". Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40perFact.info. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...40dixonary.net. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I'm happy either way now I know what to look for and I need a crown to
add to my collection - so, I'll abstain *JohnnyB* On 05/08/2019 23:38, Daniel B. Widdis wrote: > Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that > I'd gather feedback later.Ā* Of course, then I got distracted and > feedback was sparse. Ā* But it seemed most were at least content with > the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured > it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental > private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public > definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. > > Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with > Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having > things public by default is a preferred option.Ā* Plus, Judy probably > has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid > of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) > > So can we put this to a vote?Ā* Where do we want replies sent?Ā* Please > reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or > indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. > > *Option 1: "To the group". > * > > This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both > "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. > > Pro: > We've been playing that way for years and are used to it > Votes are public by default > Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors > Email format that Coryphaeus expects > Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists > Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by > default and users had to take specific action to send private email > > Con: > Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ > The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of > emails on configuring replies > Different reply-to behavior than normal email > > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > * > * > This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and > "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case > the group. > > Pro: > Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public > discussion" lists. > Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could > (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) > Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by > default) > Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs > > Con: > Not what we're used to > Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion > Not compatible with Coryphaeus > > Your votes? > *Option 1: "To the group". * > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for > fake defs."* > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com > <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source =footer>. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...hn-barrs.co.uk. |
[Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I'm going to abstain too. I read all messages on the group website, send
my fake defs as new messages in my email client, and only use reply on the website to cast my votes. I suppose that's actually a vote for Option 3! -- Tim L On Monday, August 5, 2019 at 11:38:16 PM UTC+1, Daniel Widdis wrote: > > Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd > gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was > sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and > while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned > soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less > severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional > public DQs revealing the def. > > Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, > of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things > public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus > of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so > perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) > > So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please > reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate > you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. > > > *Option 1: "To the group". * > > This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" > and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. > > Pro: > We've been playing that way for years and are used to it > Votes are public by default > Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors > Email format that Coryphaeus expects > Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists > Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by > default and users had to take specific action to send private email > > Con: > Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ > The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails > on configuring replies > Different reply-to behavior than normal email > > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > > This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply > All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. > > Pro: > Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" > lists. > Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could > (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) > Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) > Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs > > Con: > Not what we're used to > Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion > Not compatible with Coryphaeus > > Your votes? > *Option 1: "To the group". * > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake > defs."* > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...oglegroups.com. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
Option 1 for me. Since I think of the mailing list as a forum, not as a list
of private emails or an email thread with several participants, it's natural that a simple reply goes to the group. ------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-05 at 18:38 Daniel B. Widdis wrote: > Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd > gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was > sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and > while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned > soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less > severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional > public DQs revealing the def. > Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, > of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things > public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus > of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so > perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) > So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply > with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're > happy with what the plurality of voters say. > *Option 1: "To the group". * > This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" > and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. > Pro: > We've been playing that way for years and are used to it > Votes are public by default > Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors > Email format that Coryphaeus expects > Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists > Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default > and users had to take specific action to send private email > Con: > Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ > The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on > configuring replies > Different reply-to behavior than normal email > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply > All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. > Pro: > Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" > lists. > Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could > (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) > Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) > Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs > Con: > Not what we're used to > Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion > Not compatible with Coryphaeus > Your votes? > *Option 1: "To the group". * > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake > defs."* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...nybodyhome.com. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I was used to the old way. Now I'm used to the new way. I find it quite logical: I can click "reply" or "reply all" as the situation warrants, without ever needing to delete and replace an address. So, I have a slight preference for keeping the new way (option 2) - but I think I could get used to the old way again. Count me with the "don't cares."
Efrem > On Aug 5, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Daniel B. Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> wrote: > > Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. > > Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) > > So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. > > Option 1: "To the group". > > This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. > > Pro: > We've been playing that way for years and are used to it > Votes are public by default > Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors > Email format that Coryphaeus expects > Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists > Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email > > Con: > Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ > The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies > Different reply-to behavior than normal email > > Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". > > This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. > > Pro: > Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. > Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) > Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) > Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs > > Con: > Not what we're used to > Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion > Not compatible with Coryphaeus > > Your votes? > Option 1: "To the group". > Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". > Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source =footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...%40verizon.net. |
Re: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I vote for 1.
On 8/5/2019 7:11 PM, France International/Mike Shefler wrote: > I vote for #1. > > On 8/5/2019 6:38 PM, Daniel B. Widdis wrote: >> Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea >> that I'd gather feedback later.Ā* Of course, then I got distracted and >> feedback was sparse. Ā* But it seemed most were at least content with >> the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured >> it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental >> private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public >> definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. >> >> Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with >> Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps >> having things public by default is a preferred option.Ā* Plus, Judy >> probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like >> to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad >> after all? :) >> >> So can we put this to a vote?Ā* Where do we want replies sent?Ā* Please >> reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or >> indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. >> >> *Option 1: "To the group". >> * >> >> This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both >> "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. >> >> Pro: >> We've been playing that way for years and are used to it >> Votes are public by default >> Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors >> Email format that Coryphaeus expects >> Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists >> Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by >> default and users had to take specific action to send private email >> >> Con: >> Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ >> The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of >> emails on configuring replies >> Different reply-to behavior than normal email >> >> *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* >> * >> * >> This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and >> "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this >> case the group. >> >> Pro: >> Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public >> discussion" lists. >> Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could >> (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) >> Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by >> default) >> Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs >> >> Con: >> Not what we're used to >> Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion >> Not compatible with Coryphaeus >> >> Your votes? >> *Option 1: "To the group". * >> *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* >> *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for >> fake defs."* >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Dixonary" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com >> <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/CAAbgggrYOzpVgyZeadVHoZWgKa2RCHKrTJD5hT%2B9a7%3DgC kYHHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source =footer>. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Dixonary" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com > <mailto:dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...0salsgiver.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dixonary/0b7e6a36-0302-c3e4-d8e2-e6675de13eef%40salsgiver.com?utm_medium=email&utm_ source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...rristevens.com. |
[Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
Votes for returning to the old way = 9
Votes for the new way = 0 Abstentions/don't care = 4 The settings have been returned to "to the group". Judy, get your crowns ready. ;) On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM Daniel B. Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> wrote: > Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd > gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was > sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and > while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned > soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less > severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional > public DQs revealing the def. > > Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, > of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things > public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus > of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so > perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) > > So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please > reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate > you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. > > > *Option 1: "To the group". * > > This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" > and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. > > Pro: > We've been playing that way for years and are used to it > Votes are public by default > Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors > Email format that Coryphaeus expects > Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists > Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by > default and users had to take specific action to send private email > > Con: > Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ > The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails > on configuring replies > Different reply-to behavior than normal email > > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > > This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply > All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. > > Pro: > Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" > lists. > Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could > (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) > Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) > Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs > > Con: > Not what we're used to > Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion > Not compatible with Coryphaeus > > Your votes? > *Option 1: "To the group". * > *Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent".* > *Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake > defs."* > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. |
RE: [Dixonary] [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote
I have lots of them ready. LOL! Actually, that will be better than receiving duplicate messages or having a dealer reposting votes, I think.
Judy Original message From: "Daniel B. Widdis" <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com; Dated: 8/6/2019 2:42:37 PM Subject: [Dixonary] Re: [OT] Group Email Settings -- please vote Votes for returning to the old way = 9 Votes for the new way = 0 Abstentions/don't care = 4 The settings have been returned to "to the group". Judy, get your crowns ready. ;) On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM Daniel B. Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> wrote: Originally, I changed the email settings as a test, with the idea that I'd gather feedback later. Of course, then I got distracted and feedback was sparse. But it seemed most were at least content with the change and while I know it's hard to learn new things, I figured it'd be relearned soon enough, and that the impact of accidental private votes was a far less severe problem than the impact of public definitions (Dixons) or occasional public DQs revealing the def. Of course, the confusion of this last round (and the difficulty with Cory, of which I am a fellow user) has highlighted that perhaps having things public by default is a preferred option. Plus, Judy probably has a surplus of crowns in her closet and would really like to get rid of them, so perhaps the Dixon behavior isn't that bad after all? :) So can we put this to a vote? Where do we want replies sent? Please reply with one of the below two options, or optionally abstain or indicate you're happy with what the plurality of voters say. Option 1: "To the group". This was the previous setting that we've had for years, where both "reply" and "reply all" will be forced to the group email address. Pro: We've been playing that way for years and are used to it Votes are public by default Easier for others to doublecheck dealer score errors Email format that Coryphaeus expects Matches the behavior of "public discussion" mailing lists Matches original TAPCIS forum behavior where replies were public by default and users had to take specific action to send private email Con: Increases the chance of a Dixon or public DQ The group takes away choice from both the sender and recipient of emails on configuring replies Different reply-to behavior than normal email Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". This is the current setting, where "Reply" goes to the author and "Reply All" goes to both the author and the recipient(s), in this case the group. Pro: Behaves like most email and email lists that aren't "public discussion" lists. Gives the dealer a choice of configuring replies (The dealer could (optionally) set the reply to the group to prevent private votes) Gives recipients a choice of replies (public "NAD" private defs by default) Reduces the chance of Dixons or public DQs Con: Not what we're used to Increases the chance of private votes and subsequent scoring confusion Not compatible with Coryphaeus Your votes? Option 1: "To the group". Option 2: "Users decide where their replies are sent". Option 3: "It's just a game, the only votes I want to cast are for fake defs." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/di...APTOP-BV6VBI87. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.